Search for: "People v. Commissioners of Taxes and Assessments"
Results 61 - 80
of 116
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2018, 9:55 pm
That also means that it will be as important for states to provide a means of training people to read and assess these reports as it is for states to develop the ability to produce them. 6. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:00 am
The recent Tax Court decision in Woodley v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 9:01 am
We recommend that firms discuss the annual review with their outside counsel or compliance firm, who can provide guidance about the review process as well as a template for the assessment and documentation. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 9:01 am
We recommend that firms discuss the annual review with their outside counsel or compliance firm, who can provide guidance about the review process as well as a template for the assessment and documentation. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 12:19 pm
For example, if you ask a state tax officer when were the assessments? [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 10:21 am
Fiduciary Duty v. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 5:22 pm
As President, I must act to protect the security and interests of the United States and its people. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 5:05 am
One provision being discussed in the reform package would prohibit city commissioners from helping to raise money for candidates. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
For an example, look no further than the celebrated Costeja v. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 4:48 am
In Gann v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 5:36 am
Arizona v. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 3:55 pm
We recommend that firms discuss the annual review with their outside counsel or compliance firm, who can provide guidance about the review process as well as a template for the assessment and documentation. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 8:19 am
The Tax Department denied the request and also assessed a penalty. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 7:01 am
Voss v. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 4:00 pm
Citibank, N.A. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 4:05 pm
’ He also said that ‘When people and companies use legal means to minimize their tax bills, that’s not corrupt or greedy or unfair, it’s playing by the rules. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
Along with the three MPs’ expenses cases discussed above, it sits well alongside Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority v Information Commissioner and Leapman [2015] EWCA 388 in underlining the critical importance of the public itself being able to assess the genuineness of politicians’ expense claims. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 9:10 am
This was the standard that had been applied in Burnip, and was said to find further support in the Supreme Court’s decision in Humphreys v Revenue and Customs Commissioners. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 10:03 am
In the linked cases of R (on the application of Catt) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis & Anor and another case [2015] UKSC 9 (Case Comment here), the Court was asked to consider whether the retention of records by the police relating to acts that occurred in public (in these cases, protesting and an argument with a neighbour) could be contrary to the right to privacy. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 5:08 pm
It is United States v. [read post]
