Search for: "People v. Cooks" Results 81 - 100 of 1,322
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2023, 12:56 pm by Giles Peaker
As famously expressed by Knight Bruce V-C in Walter v Selfe (1851) 4 De G & Sm 315, 322, the question is whether the interference ought to be considered a material inconvenience “not merely according to elegant or dainty modes and habits of living, but according to plain and sober and simple notions among the English people”; see also Barr v Biffa Waste Services Ltd (2013) QB 455, para 36(ii). [read post]
11 Feb 2023, 8:13 pm by Bill Marler
Norovirus cases were increasing throughout Europe and the Pacific at the same time. [36] One issue with cruise ships is the close contact between people as living quarters are so close, and despite education efforts, there still seems to be a lack of public understanding regarding how the illness is spread. [7, 14] On the other hand, reporting occurs much more quickly in these situations because of the close proximity and concentration of illness, allowing for the quicker detection of… [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court said it cannot identify the person who in the spring leaked a draft of the opinion that overturned Roe v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 10:00 am by Kelly Goles
Among these were 22 in-person classes and tours for 292 people. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 3:45 am by Kyle Hulehan
Tobacco Tax Differentials Incentivize Smuggling People respond to incentives. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 12:49 am by INFORRM
” (the answer, for most people, is likely to be “not very well”). [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Additionally, Judge Seeger then said the courts are not bound to follow decisions of equal or inferior courts, citing People v. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 5:01 am by Jeff Welty
I asked for either for them to cook it some more or exchange my order. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 10:30 am
But it wasn't primarily due to the burn from the ECG pad.Which, perhaps, is why the jury awarded no damages.I understand that in both civil and criminal cases, people -- including those who testify under oath -- sometimes act more as advocates rather than neutral witnesses.But that's not what the process calls for. [read post]