Search for: "People v. County of Santa Clara"
Results 121 - 140
of 172
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2011, 6:19 am
Santa Clara County, which clears the way for “cities and counties to hire private lawyers, and offer them a share of the proceeds, when suing companies for the huge costs of cleaning up lead paint. [read post]
27 May 2009, 2:30 am
Transportation Agency of Santa Clara County, the Supreme Court rejected the claim of Paul Johnson, a white male employee who alleged that his employer unlawfully promoted a woman over him by taking sex into account pursuant to an affirmative action plan. [read post]
19 May 2021, 12:34 pm
By 2016, a broad coalition including EFF, ACLU of Northern California, CAIR San Francisco-Bay Area, Electronic Frontier Alliance (EFA) member Oakland Privacy, and many others passed the first ordinance of its kind in Santa Clara County, California. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 1:41 pm
The case, County of Santa Clara v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 10:12 am
First, County of Santa Clara v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 5:05 am
In Santa Clara, Calif., and San Francisco, officials have banned large gatherings. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 5:45 pm
Superior Court (1985) 39 Cal.3d 740 and County of Santa Clara v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 1:40 pm
Santa Clara County, holding that health care centers that primarily serve the poor cannot sue drug companies for overcharging them. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm
People v. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 10:10 am
The counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Sonoma and the City of Berkeley have reportedly agreed to follow a similar framework. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 7:32 am
Creed v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am
Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund, holding that state courts retain concurrent jurisdiction for liability actions under the Securities Act of 1933. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 12:34 am
Santa Clara County wants the company to pay back money from all sales of Avandia in California since 1999, as well as pay restitution for medical treatment given to Avandia users who suffered heart problems. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 10:21 pm
This panoptic surveillance apparatus is offered to state highway patrols, local police departments, and county sheriffs across the country for less than $10,000 per year. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, December 17, 2008 US v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 12:23 pm
County of Santa Clara The controversy was reignited in part by the United States Supreme Court’s recent refusal to hear the appeal of a California Supreme Court decision holding that the government can hire private attorneys on a contingenct basis under certain circumstances. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 12:51 am
Santa Clara Valley Water Dist. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 12:51 am
Santa Clara Valley Water Dist. v. [read post]
