Search for: "People v. County of Santa Clara"
Results 141 - 160
of 172
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2010, 3:30 pm
Beckwith, 129 U.S. 26, 28 (1888) (corporation entitled to due process of law under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments); Santa Clara County v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:35 am
The key case for constitutional law purposes is Santa Clara County v. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
(See my public prosecutor category page for posts on the Santa Clara case.) [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
The warming climate is driving several thousand people north, to Copenhagen — for two weeks, anyway. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 2:48 pm
The origins of the notion that corporations are “persons” with constitutional rights are somewhat obscure (often traced, perhaps erroneously, to an 1886 Supreme Court decision, in Santa Clara County v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 3:41 am
Transportation Agency of Santa Clara County, Scalia argued that white men are "victims" in society but that women and people of color are powerful. [read post]
27 May 2009, 2:30 am
Transportation Agency of Santa Clara County, the Supreme Court rejected the claim of Paul Johnson, a white male employee who alleged that his employer unlawfully promoted a woman over him by taking sex into account pursuant to an affirmative action plan. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
Employee required to answer employer's work-related inquiriesSpielbauer v County of Santa Clara [Calif.], Supreme Court of California, decided February 9, 2009. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 7:31 am
Would that fly in front of the JAMS-appointed arbitrators in Santa Clara county? [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 12:30 am
Indeed, the issue is pending right now in the Supreme Court of California in County of Santa Clara v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, December 17, 2008 US v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:06 pm
And a suit filed by San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Santa Clara County contends that the proposition puts them under "inconsistent obligations" to enforce the new constitutional provision while also being under an obligation to respect the right to equal protection of the laws for their LGBT residents, as that right was identified by the California Supreme Court in May. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 1:55 am
The other suits, filed by the leading LGBT public interest law firms and the ACLU, and by three governmental entities (cities of San Francisco and Los Angeles, and Santa Clara County), represent several couples who planned to marry in California and now would be barred from doing so, and the government entities, who would be precluded by Prop 8 from honoring the right to equal protection of the laws of their gay residents. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 10:00 am
County of Santa Clara v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 8:09 pm
Read the unpublished decision at PEOPLE v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 12:26 pm
Things turned nasty and both sides moved for sanctions.In a tentative order filed Thursday (see Page 31 of this pdf) , Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge Socrates "Pete" Manoukian rejected both sides' request for sanctions. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 3:30 pm
Several things stand out in yesterday's opinion in County of Santa Clara v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 12:00 am
A 9th Circuit panel ruled Wednesday that state sovereign immunity does not extend to a private contractor hired by the Santa Clara County DA's office to go after individuals who passed bad checks. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 10:56 am
Judge Paez, of all people. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 1:04 pm
Yesterday, in County of Santa Clara v. [read post]
