Search for: "People v. Courts (1985)" Results 21 - 40 of 1,444
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2018, 2:25 pm
The Court of Appeal sometimes provides neutral insight into the lives of people with whom you are not typically personally familiar. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 4:02 pm
Apparently Wandsworth are very very unhappy with the Court of Appeal judgment in Wandsworth v Randall on underoccupation possessions via ground 16 HA 1985. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 2:48 pm by Jon Sands
United States, 471 U.S. 858 (1985), was not abrogated by the decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 6:31 am by Miriam Seifter
Township of Scott, the Supreme Court revisited a 1985 case that has made it difficult to bring certain takings claims in federal court. [read post]
The result of this invidious doctrine, as formulated in Chan Wing-Siu v The Queen [1985] 1 AC 168, meant that “if two people set out to commit an offence (crime A), and in the course of that joint enterprise, one of them (D1) commits another offence (crime B), the second person (D2) is guilty as an accessory to crime B if he has foreseen the possibility that D1 might act as he did. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:38 pm by Donald Thompson
 With respect to grand jury proceedings, the district attorney has a “duty of fair dealing to the accused” (People v Pelchat, 62 NY2d 97, 105 [1984]; see also, People v Lancaster, 69 NY2d 20, 26 [1986]) and to the court (People v Ianniello, 21 NY2d 418, 424 [1968]). [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 1:10 pm
Street (1985) 471 U.S. 409, 414; see also People v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 9:00 am by Eric Goldman
Because it didn’t host the photo, the court dismisses Fox’s direct liability per Flava Works and Perfect 10 v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
Ind. 1985) (refusing to find a federal question even where defendants alleged that the court process abused was the federal court process). [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 5:48 pm by Brian Shiffrin
People v Ferro, 63 NY2d 316, 321 [1984], cert denied 472 US 1007 [1985]). [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 3:37 am by Stephanie Smith, Arden Chambers.
  I wonder if the Supreme Court will agree… [read post]