Search for: "People v. Cox" Results 261 - 280 of 464
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2019, 7:28 am
The Court suggested that most people would not notice the differences between an old Porsche design and the latest model.Can you tell what Porsche model this Kat is sitting on? [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 8:09 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Cox Court Denies Restraining Order Against Ex-Boyfriend Who Threatened to Post Revenge Porn — EC v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 1:59 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
The court largely relies on the Virginia Supreme Court’s decision in Network Solutions v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 5:54 am by David Bernstein
The editors explained how they chose the names on the survey list: “The names were chosen during the editorial meeting attended by Cox, Bradford, Holmes and Virkkala. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 8:31 am
Fawsett, visiting from the federal district court in Orlando, said the majority opinion failed to allow claims over the type of conduct that reasonable people had come to expect they will be protected from in the workplace.The case was Corbitt v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:12 am by Scott Bomboy
In 1941, Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes wrote for a unanimous Court in Cox v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Shalini Bhargava Ray
” Rodríguez and Cox note further that Congress has legislated a draconian code with the knowledge that the executive will select a small subset of the deportable population for enforcement. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 11:00 am by Eugene Volokh
Fighting words, which are restricted because of a danger that they can provoke criminal retaliation, have also at times been folded within this doctrine: Cox v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
Some practitioners were surprised that Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17 reached the country’s highest court. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 3:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Your ad makes fun of overweight people: respond to the complaint. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 8:00 am by David Kris, Nate Jones
Bolton has also referred to federal campaign finance laws as an “overreact[ion]” to Watergate, and fought against them as counsel for the petitioners in Buckley v. [read post]