Search for: "People v. Coyle" Results 41 - 60 of 115
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2013, 6:20 am by Cormac Early
King, in which the Court will consider whether the Fourth Amendment allows states to collect and analyze DNA from people arrested and charged with serious crimes. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
Common Cause and Lamone v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:40 am by Adam Chandler
Oral Argument in McDonald v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 4:45 am by Marcia Coyle
Marcia Coyle is a regular contributor to Constitution Daily and PBS NewsHour. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court session, which begins October 2, could be a critical one for LGBT people. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 7:24 pm
Simmons and of people of any age for crimes against individuals other than murder last year in Kennedy v. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
” Horvitz & Levy’s At the Lectern blog notes that the justices also declined to review “the California Supreme Court’s decision in People v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am by Amy Howe
Still more coverage comes from Tony Mauro and Marcia Coyle, who in The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required) report that the decision  “was a major leap, but not the final legal step in ending discrimination against lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered people. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 4:56 am by Edith Roberts
Today the court will hear oral argument in Venezuela v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
Actually, most people labeled them as Luddites. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Hughes v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
Constitution Daily’s We the People podcast features a discussion of United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
” At The National Law Journal, Marcia Coyle reports that “[a] rare confession of error by the U.S. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 6:09 am by Kiran Bhat
As Conor noted yesterday, reactions to the Court’s recent decision in Brown v. [read post]