Search for: "People v. Crawford" Results 81 - 100 of 501
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2018, 10:00 pm
§ 106.50(2r)(bm) entitled “Animals Assisting Persons with Disabilities" which was a very confusing provision and only focused on animals that assisted people with visual, hearing, or mobility impairments and only applied to animals that were specially trained.Replaces the above statutory section with two separate provisions, one addressing Animals That Do Work or Perform Tasks for Persons with Disabilities, and one for Emotional Support Animals. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 10:00 pm by Tristan R. Pettit, Esq.
§ 106.50(2r)(bm) entitled “Animals Assisting Persons with Disabilities" which was a very confusing provision and only focused on animals that assisted people with visual, hearing, or mobility impairments and only applied to animals that were specially trained.Replaces the above statutory section with two separate provisions, one addressing Animals That Do Work or Perform Tasks for Persons with Disabilities, and one for Emotional Support Animals. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 10:00 pm
§ 106.50(2r)(bm) entitled “Animals Assisting Persons with Disabilities" which was a very confusing provision and only focused on animals that assisted people with visual, hearing, or mobility impairments and only applied to animals that were specially trained.Replaces the above statutory section with two separate provisions, one addressing Animals That Do Work or Perform Tasks for Persons with Disabilities, and one for Emotional Support Animals. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 10:45 am
”CommentWhile de Havilland's attorneys have already announced that they will appeal the ruling, unsurprisingly filmmakers and film studios have welcomed the outcome of this case, with MPAA stating that the decision "represents a major legal victory for filmmakers and creators of all kinds, re-affirming their First Amendment right to tell stories about and inspired by real people and events in genres including docudramas, biopics, historical fiction, and… [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 8:31 am
Shibutani Derelicts of Company K (1978) v. 200 How come..we have to live in this shit hole?... [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 5:26 pm by daniel
Beginning with a California Supreme Court decision called Comedy III Productions v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:33 am by Andrew Hamm
The judge allowed the prosecution to introduce the bags and certificates as evidence at trial despite Melendez-Diaz’s objection, which was based on the Supreme Court’s 2004 ruling in Crawford v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 1:10 pm
(Crawford, at p. 50.)In People v. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 5:52 pm by kaplan4law
As the Supreme Court recognized in a landmark 2004 case, Crawford v. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 6:01 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
During the interview, Catherine Zeta-Jones, as Olivia de Havilland, is portrayed as saying: "There was never a rivalry like theirs [Davis and Crawford]. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by John Dean
ANSWER: Some of his liberal opinions included, and not in any order: Crawford v. [read post]