Search for: "People v. Crawford" Results 161 - 180 of 503
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2014, 2:56 pm
  And isn't it clear that if Crawford and Hammon v. [read post]
11 May 2014, 9:15 pm
Ricardo Pereira & Orla Gough, Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources in the 21st Century: Natural Resource Governance and the Right to Self-Determination of Indigenous Peoples Under International LawPeter Margulies, Sovereignty and Cyber Attacks: Technology's Challenge to the Law of State ResponsibilityJames Crawford, 'Dreamers of the Day': Australia and the International Court of JusticePeter Holcombe Henley & Niels M Blokker The Group of 20: A Short… [read post]
9 May 2014, 12:36 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In the People v Foster 27 NY2d 47 52 [1970] the defendant challenged the admission of the speedometer deviation record into evidence to prove the reliability of the speedometer. [read post]
5 May 2014, 4:54 pm by Stephen Bilkis
People v Kanhai Court Discusses Whether Business Records are an Exception to the Hearsay Rule under the Principle of Crawford v Washington The criminal defendant was arrested and charged for one count of of driving a motor vehicle while impaired by alcohol DWI under section 1192(1) of the Vehicle and Traffic Law. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 7:37 am by Wells Bennett
 Similar problems inhered in the appointment of Crawford’s successor, Vice Adm. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 2:22 pm
“After Thomas’s very first conference,” Crawford writes, “Scalia changed his mind” in Foucha v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 2:42 pm by Kim Krawiec
This week, perma-Lounger Bridget Crawford (Pace) and special guest blogger Lisa Milot (Georgia) will join us in the Lounge for a mini-symposium on Perez v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 6:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Force people to identify themselves, promoting self-surveillance. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 2:11 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Finally, the fact that their preparation was incidental to a police surveillance operation does not make them inadmissible as was held in People v Guidice. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 1:28 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Crawford v Washington and People v Brown held that the Confrontation Clause bars the admission of testimonial out-of-court statements made by a witness who is not subject to cross-examination. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 10:17 am
In a lesson about using “flimsy grounds” for stopping people on suspicion of texting while driving, an Ontario Superior Court judge has thrown out an alcohol-related conviction after a cop stopped a driver he thought had a cellphone in his hand while at a red light.The officer “clearly operated on a hunch,” says Richard Litkowski, an associate at Hicks Adams LLP who represented Imran Mughal on the appeal of his conviction in R. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 1:34 pm
However, the records inspection and maintenance and the calibration of the instrument were not testimonial hearsay as such his confrontation rights were not violated under the principle established Crawford v Washington, 541 US 36 (2004). [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:32 am
” (The footnote provides the name and citation of the opinion: Crawford v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 9:10 pm by Peter Tillers
One of the landmark cases in which such requirements were affirmed, Crawford v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:32 am by Amy Howe
At the Brennan Center for Justice, Andrew Cohen responds to an editorial in The Wall Street Journal that criticizes Attorney General Eric Holder and cites the Court’s decision in Crawford v. [read post]