Search for: "People v. DISTRICT COURT, ETC."
Results 141 - 160
of 941
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2011, 2:26 pm
R (Baron, Peat & Othrs) v Hyndburn District Council, Administrative Court, Manchester District Registry, 14 April 2011 (Not on BAILII as yet)J has previously alluded to this case involving an application for permission for Judicial Review of a local authority decision to make a selective licensing designation. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 10:14 pm
There are certainly people who generally don't like patent injunctions (or, even more generally, patents), and they will beg to disagree with Apple's recent representation (to the same appeals court) that "the costs to innovation will be profound" if injunctions become practically unavailable in this industry. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 6:55 am
Resolving Juror Confusion New York’s Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department rendered an opinion in People v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 1:20 pm
The district court dismisses the suit at the pleading stage. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 5:19 am
People v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 5:02 am
See, Int’l Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 3:43 am
” The latter quote is from the Supreme Court’s decision in Beck v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
” Sgouros v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 9:57 pm
She is a former experienced judge in civil and commercial trials at the Shanghai Pudong New District People’s Court in China. [read post]
25 Jul 2009, 12:32 am
Tompkins principles in Rimbert v. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
The District Court and First Circuit agreed with Mr. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 4:30 am
In Ross v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 8:01 am
Cuomo, etc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit, based in Chicago, ruled on April 23 in Nuxoll v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 6:00 am
Hughes v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 8:03 am
” This question dropped like a ton of bricks, in light of the fact that several district court judges showed no hesitation to rely on such statements. [read post]
9 May 2008, 4:07 am
In view of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Riegel v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:11 pm
Wandsworth backed away from that case, but the view of some, including me, at the time, was that the terms were effectively a personal obligation, not a term of the tenancy.We have just heard about a County Court judgment in a case, LB Wandsworth v Maggott, in Wandsworth County Court, where exactly that was held. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:11 pm
Wandsworth backed away from that case, but the view of some, including me, at the time, was that the terms were effectively a personal obligation, not a term of the tenancy.We have just heard about a County Court judgment in a case, LB Wandsworth v Maggott, in Wandsworth County Court, where exactly that was held. [read post]
