Search for: "People v. DISTRICT COURT OF SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT" Results 1 - 17 of 17
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2019, 12:56 pm by Neil Siegel
For example, fifty thousand people might elect a representative in one district while two hundred and fifty thousand people in another district elected a representative to the same legislature. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
(This is even clearer in light of the Court’s correct decision in INS v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
As a result, the case does not directly address the question now presented—whether a legislature’s prescribed timeline can be judicially overridden.Perhaps the most directly relevant case is Valenti v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Ilya Shapiro
The Supreme Court ruled in the 1964 case of Reynolds v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Matamoros-Modesta, No. 07-4105 Sentence for illegal reentry is vacated and remanded where the district court erred in the wake of the Supreme Court's decision in Lopez v. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 9:02 pm by Vikram David Amar
As many Verdict readers know, the Supreme Court this term will hear arguments in Moore v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 Trump himself made this Positions Clause argument before the Colorado Supreme Court, and he even prevailed on it in the Colorado district court. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 1:19 pm
In the words of the Fifth District Appellate Court in Schofield v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 6:12 pm by Rick
The court was set up to ensure the fair enforcement of laws against prominent people, those so powerful that ordinary courts could never convict them of their crimes. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  District court judge Lorenzo Sawyer wrote in 1886 that if a Chinese man came here and did not bring a wife, eventually he would die off like a worn-out steam engine; as a machine, he would not leave a bunch of children to fill his place. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am by Barry Sookman
Given the importance of the roles played by the courts in interpreting IP laws, and in mediating between different perspectives on what their underlying purposes are, it is important to understand the judicial views about intellectual property rights. [read post]