Search for: "People v. Daniels (1991)" Results 1 - 20 of 84
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
That got pushed back to 1987, the bicentennial of the Constitution, and then to 1991, the bicentennial of the Bill of Rights. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:47 am by Reference Staff
Supreme Court had finally weighed in and the Indigenous people of Washington had won yet again.Charles Wilkinson was a legal scholar and advocate for Indigenous peoples. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
But officials broke "[v]irtually every promise" they made. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
[As longtime LHB readers know, I post here the essays I research and write for my exam in American Legal History, which principally treats the years 1898 to 1962. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am by Paula Junghans
To conceal the hush money payment, it was agreed that Cohen would make the payment to Daniels via a shell company (Essential Consultants), on the agreement that Trump would later reimburse Cohen. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:51 am by centerforartlaw
In General Counsel Memorandum 39862 (Nov. 21, 1991),[30] even indirect or unintentional private benefits can jeopardize a taxpayer’s tax exemption status. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
(D.), [1991] 1 S.C.R. 742, at p. 758. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
While our cases prohibiting viewpoint discrimination would fetter the state's power to some degree, see R.A.V. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
” They made sacrifices in service of their community, in the same way that constitutions must serve the people. [read post]
15 May 2022, 12:25 am by Frank Cranmer
Cemetery pollution in Russia In Solyanik v Russia [2022] ECHR 359, the cemetery adjacent to the applicant’s house had been gradually expanding towards it since 1991 and after its closure in 1995, burials resumed in 2010. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Petitioner asserted that she was very shocked and did not see the termination coming, such that she asked for an explanation three times; again, petitioner was told that "some people fit in here and some people don't, and you just don't fit in. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Petitioner asserted that she was very shocked and did not see the termination coming, such that she asked for an explanation three times; again, petitioner was told that "some people fit in here and some people don't, and you just don't fit in. [read post]