Search for: "People v. David W." Results 1 - 20 of 814
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2014, 2:49 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Finally, it was settled in People v Lawrence that recantation evidence is unreliable. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 3:25 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The People were, however, able to obtain the pre-sentence report. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 7:01 pm
Grossman had an op-ed entitled "Sandra Day O'Connor v. the People. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 6:33 am by By Amy Kates
As a law school student at Yale, Jeremy Goldman was enraptured by David Boies' commanding, if losing, performance in Bush v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 11:48 am by NARF
Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2024.html David W. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
He cited specific black people who had criticized King. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 7:20 pm by Brian Shiffrin
The due process guarantees in the United States and New York Constitutions require that a defendant be afforded notice of the hearing to determine his or her risk level pursuant to SORA and a meaningful opportunity to respond to the risk level assessment (see § 168-n [3]; People v David W., 95 NY2d 130, 136-140). [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 3:58 am by NCC Staff
Gore decision was the one decision most people had asked him about. [read post]
On 18 February 2016, the Supreme Court handed down its much awaited judgment in the appeal of R v Jogee [2013] EWCA Crim 1433, which was consolidated with the Privy Council appeal of Ruddock v The Queen JCPC 2015/0020. [read post]
25 Dec 2006, 5:05 am
(Ludicrous complaints against famous people are not that unusual: in 2002, a similarly delusional Texas woman alleged that George W. [read post]
3 May 2012, 6:36 am by James Eckert
  My own view was that this was an obvious due process violation, as the defendant's status as a sex offender was determined at a proceeding which denied him notice and an opportunity to be heard (much as the original SORA classification process struck down in People v David W, 95 NY2d 130 [2000] [holding that the availability of an Article 78 was insufficient to satisfy the requirements of due process as to the level of classification]). [read post]