Search for: "People v. Davis (1987)"
Results 41 - 60
of 99
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2012, 11:37 am
See Davies v. [read post]
[David Bernstein] Do the Ethnic Categories Used by Universities for "Diversity" Purposes Make Sense?
4 May 2022, 3:50 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
Davis, No. 07-1964 A conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm and possession of cocaine base with intent to distribute is affirmed where: 1) although a vehicular safety statute involving dangling ornaments that police relied upon to make the stop at issue was unconstitutionally vague; 2) nevertheless, the exclusionary rule did not apply as police were relying in good faith on a presumptively valid statute. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
State of California (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1108; see People v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:46 am
Coffing Hoist Div., Duff-Norton Co., 528 A.2d 590 (Pa. 1987)(evidence of industry standards are inadmissible in strict products liability actions) Davis v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 7:16 am
From a panel decision Bennie v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 4:04 am
” Constitution Daily’s We the People podcast features a discussion of Murr v. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 6:55 am
v=ngxZVmtKCCo&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch? [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Case style: Neese v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas Davis v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas Davis v. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 4:09 am
The police were then contacted (R. 135).Snell said that it was not difficult to go under the house to seewhere the depression was located, and that there were houses onboth sides of the DeCarr residence, and people from those houses could see what they were doing (R. 138-39). [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm
Jews for Jesus, Inc., 482 U.S. 569 (1987) (stating that an airport’s proposed interpretation of a speech-restricting policy would be unconstitutionally vague, even if an airport were to be treated as a nonpublic forum); International Soc. for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 12:14 pm
In United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
"[9] Thus, for instance, that some people are offended or alienated by an employee's religion does not justify the employer in firing the employee. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 4:26 pm
That notion was contained in a single sentence in the Court’s 1987 decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 3:28 am
” At the Associated Press, Thomas Beaumont and Steve Peoples report that “[e]ven among this year’s most prized voting bloc — educated suburban women — there’s no evidence that a groundswell of opposition to a conservative transformation of the judicial branch, which could lead to the erosion or reversal of Roe v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 1:49 pm
That ruling, U.S. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:47 am
Davis Law Review. 26 (1993) : 791-851. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 6:37 pm
During the signing, my Aunt indicated that she wanted to make some minor changes to the percentages being distributed to some of the people in her [w]ill, and some handwritten changes were made at that time. [read post]
