Search for: "People v. Davis (1987)"
Results 41 - 60
of 97
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm
If yes, the law is little changed as a practical matter, and the same people will be convicted, by and large. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 8:20 pm
Likewise, the circumstances of some shootings, by their nature, can establish the defendant’s intent to cause serious physical injury (see, People v Vigliotti, 270 AD2d 904 [4th Dept 2000] [victim shot in chest from two feet or less during argument with defendant; proof sufficient to establish intent to cause serious physical injury]; People v Ramirez, 182 AD2d 569 [1st Dept 1992] [same]; People v Dukes, 30 AD3d 682 [3rd Dept 2006]… [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 8:50 am
Davis v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
American Honda Motor Co., 505 So.2d 358, 361 (Ala. 1987) (cited in Deere). [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Consideration of Hamdi v. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 11:27 pm
Consider Davis v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 8:01 am
See Davis-Kidd Booksellers, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm
Jews for Jesus, Inc., 482 U.S. 569 (1987) (stating that an airport’s proposed interpretation of a speech-restricting policy would be unconstitutionally vague, even if an airport were to be treated as a nonpublic forum); International Soc. for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 11:34 am
Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of Westfield, 17 N.J. 67, 75 (1954), to which we owe the motion court no special deference. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:46 am
Coffing Hoist Div., Duff-Norton Co., 528 A.2d 590 (Pa. 1987)(evidence of industry standards are inadmissible in strict products liability actions) Davis v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 2:31 pm
Davis (1937) and South Dakota v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 2:59 am
’" Anderson, supra, at 639 (quoting Davis v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Davies, Wade and Richmond L. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Davies, Wade and Richmond L. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:47 am
Davis Law Review. 26 (1993) : 791-851. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:37 am
See Davies v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:37 am
See Davies v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 9:28 pm
.) ———————————— Analysis If there is a surprise in the Supreme Court’s agreement to take on the constitutional controversy over the new federal health care law, it is the Court’s willingness to rule on Congress’s power to broadly expand the right of poor people to health care benefits under the federal-state program called “Medicaid.” In that review, the Court will be… [read post]
