Search for: "People v. Davis (1992)"
Results 1 - 20
of 142
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2018, 9:18 am
The 38 lump sum people asked for a pro rata refund and were refused. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 4:22 am
The court then considered cases on ‘the impact on an applicant of a discordance between the social reality and the law’, in particular B v France [1992] ECHR 13343/87. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:04 am
Davis, 44 N.Y.2d 269, 274 [1978]; People v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:38 pm
Such a motion is waived, however, if not made within five days of arraignment (see also, People v Jones, 187 AD2d 750 [3rd Dept 1992], lv den, 81 NY2d 790 [1993]), although in some cases, discussed below, that five-day deadline may be extended. [read post]
24 May 2009, 9:11 am
Davis v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 11:22 am
Lee (1992), that approaching people to hand them leaflets is constitutionally protected even in airports (at least as to the areas before the security checkpoint). [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
First, a crucial bloc of the Supreme Court (with Justice Kennedy being a key member) in the famous 1992 Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 8:20 pm
Likewise, the circumstances of some shootings, by their nature, can establish the defendant’s intent to cause serious physical injury (see, People v Vigliotti, 270 AD2d 904 [4th Dept 2000] [victim shot in chest from two feet or less during argument with defendant; proof sufficient to establish intent to cause serious physical injury]; People v Ramirez, 182 AD2d 569 [1st Dept 1992] [same]; People v Dukes, 30 AD3d 682 [3rd Dept… [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 11:36 am
Rev. 167 (1992). [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 1:11 pm
Davis and Moore v. [read post]
21 Apr 2018, 1:40 pm
Bd. of Educ., 777 F.2d 1403, 1410 (10th Cir. 1985); Davis v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Rev. 31, 35-38, 35 n.20 (1992). [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:48 pm
Davis. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 2:03 pm
” Wieder v. [read post]
11 Nov 2017, 2:31 am
Such an interdependency can also be drawn between meaning and the likelihood of serious harm as highlighted by Davis LJ in the recent case of Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd [2017] EWCA Civ 1334. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 1:29 am
The leading authority for legal proximity is Alcock v Chief Constable of the South Yorkshire Police [1992] 1 AC 310 (‘Alcock’). [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 5:32 am
The documentary series is titled “Allen v. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 3:39 pm
Wade, and Casey, which are Supreme Court opinions from 1973 in 1992, respectively. [read post]
22 May 2018, 1:22 pm
Lee (1992)), and thus at least as clearly extends to outdoor areas on university campuses. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am
App. 1992). [read post]
