Search for: "People v. Davis (1996)"
Results 61 - 80
of 162
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2017, 6:15 pm
Davis L. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:51 pm
Div., 122 N.M. 173, 922 P.2d 555 (1996) (`”Substantial evidence” is evidence that a reasonable mind would regard as adequate to support a conclusion. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 7:16 am
From a panel decision Bennie v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 9:01 pm
Dissenting from that denial in Boyer v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 4:06 am
Davis, 454 U.S. 370 (1982) (per curiam) (upholding a forty-year sentence for possession of nine ounces of marijuana with the intent to distribute); Rummel v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 6:04 am
Oct. 11, 2011), Davis v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm
If yes, the law is little changed as a practical matter, and the same people will be convicted, by and large. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 10:45 am
” Tracomin SA v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 3:49 pm
We have previously noted that when a statute imposes criminal liability for knowingly disregarding a risk, it does not require a particular outcome or actions aimed at a specific individual; the crime is solely defined by the risk of injury produced by defendant's conduct (see, People v Davis, 72 NY2d 32, 36-37). [read post]
19 May 2015, 5:12 pm
Davis, 232 AD2d 773 [3d Dept 1996]; Mohammed v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 1:36 pm
FCC (1996). [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 3:31 pm
We have previously noted that when a statute imposes criminal liability for knowingly disregarding a risk, it does not require a particular outcome or actions aimed at a specific individual; the crime is solely defined by the risk of injury produced by defendant's conduct (see, People v Davis, 72 NY2d 32, 36-37). [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
And as the Supreme Court made clear 50 years ago in Brandenburg v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:18 pm
Something of greater urgency had bumped the survivors of a massacre within the last few weeks of as many as 2,000 people from the first half of the show. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 9:38 am
Sixthly, the decisions of this court in 2011, in Manchester City Council v Pinnock and Hounslow London Borough Council v Powell, extended the powers of the county court when hearing applications by a local authority to recover possession of a property in order to comply with article 8 of ECHR. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
App. 1996). [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 4:42 am
Davis v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 7:06 am
Saint- Gérard attributes this theory to American botanist Wade Davis). [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:38 pm
This duty of fair dealing encompasses an obligation to ensure fairness in grand jury submissions (People v Pelchat, supra; People v Jordan, 153 AD2d 263 [2nd Dept 1990]; People v Russo, 128 Misc2d 876, 880 [Co Ct Suffolk Co 1985]), which includes notice of the grand jury proceedings that gives a defendant a reasonable opportunity to exercise his right to testify, not mere technical compliance with minimum statutory notice requirements… [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 6:57 am
Moreover, people often have multiple motives for what they say. [read post]
