Search for: "People v. Davison" Results 1 - 20 of 64
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
Trump, supra, 928 F. 3d at 236, focusing on whether the social media site functions as a “tool of governance” “swathe[d] in the trappings of [the official’s] office,” see, Davison v. [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
On 9 February 2023, Master Davison dismissed the defendants’ application to strike out the claim in James Wilson v James Mendelsohn & Others [2023] EWHC 231 (KB). [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 6:09 am by Eric Goldman
Reisch Blocking Constituents from Facebook Page Violates First Amendment–Davison v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 8:24 am by Eric Goldman
Reisch Blocking Constituents from Facebook Page Violates First Amendment–Davison v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 5:54 pm by INFORRM
Organisations that do not act responsibly, posing risks to vulnerable people, or fail to meet ICO expectations will be investigated. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
On 1 August 2022, judgment was handed down in Wright v McCormack [2022] EWHC 2068 (QB) by Chamberlain J. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 10:02 am by Eric Goldman
What is more, the record shows that the Trustees hid or deleted negative comments from the Garniers that were not repetitive but did not similarly hide or delete positive comments from other people. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdiction Australia On 5 July 2021 Flick J gave judgment in the case of Kumova v Davison [2021] FCA 753. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 4:31 am by Shannon O'Hare
The blacklisting of RTSA is intended to increase pressure on Nicolás Maduro’s regime and prevent his “repression of the Venezuelan people“. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 11:13 am by Donald Dinnie
Professor Davison was responsible for ending the lives of three people between 2013 and 2015. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 11:45 am by Eric Goldman
Reisch * Blocking Constituents from Facebook Page Violates First Amendment–Davison v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 7:27 am by Eric Goldman
Accordingly, the State is enjoined from enforcing these provisions against Plaintiffs during the pendency of this suit. * Davison v. [read post]