Search for: "People v. Deas"
Results 21 - 40
of 217
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2022, 10:00 am
In the ruling (Commonwealth v. [read post]
15 May 2022, 9:11 pm
| The use of electric shock devices on people with disabilities remains deeply controversial. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 1:58 pm
The DEA investigated Mr. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:35 pm
Last month, the Minnesota Court of Appeals decided State v. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 12:30 pm
Dissent: The Supreme Court hasn't overruled Roe v. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 7:33 am
C2R also advertised that its products meet DEA disposal standards by making drugs “scientifically irretrievable. [read post]
1 May 2021, 8:23 pm
Radio v. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 5:59 pm
Property of the People v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
This decision prompted establishment of the so-called "rule of three," currently set out in Section 61.1 of the Civil Service Law and held valid by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 12:00 am
This decision prompted establishment of the so-called "rule of three," currently set out in Section 61.1 of the Civil Service Law and held valid by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 9:10 am
v=111zsenxTcw&feature=youtu.beWe know of at least two more Black men who were misidentified and falsely arrested due to face recognition technology. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 11:11 am
State v. [read post]
12 Dec 2020, 11:20 am
” United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 1:27 pm
After the Supreme Court decided Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 8:52 am
But here, the DEA argues in U.S. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 8:07 am
The key case is Printz v. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 4:34 pm
” BuzzFeed News had a piece “Lawmakers Call For Halt To Covert Surveillance Of Protesters By DEA”. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 7:23 am
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 12:30 pm
Supreme Court will review Barr v. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm
Canada In the case of Skafco Limited v. [read post]