Search for: "People v. Dees" Results 1 - 20 of 101
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2010, 6:11 am by INFORRM
In February we did a post about the argument in the case of Dee v Telegraph Media Group, in which the defendant newspaper was making a bold application for summary judgment. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 8:39 am by By Chase Strangio, Staff Attorney, ACLU
Shaw's clearly established constitutional rights were violated – constitutional rights that were set forth in the seminal case of Farmer v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 9:30 am
Amy: Back in 1994, we represented Dee Farmer in front of the Supreme Court (Farmer v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 11:36 am
 But there are definitely patterns.But then, once in while, the Court of Appeal publishes an opinion that mixes things up a bit.So today's published opinion begins:"After defendant Brady Dee Douglas’s former boyfriend, a male prostitute, told him Jeffrey B. had shorted him money following a prearranged sexual encounter, defendant and codefendant Clifton Sharpe tracked down Jeffrey and demanded the unpaid money. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 8:46 am by By Chase Strangio, Staff Attorney, ACLU
Watch the Deliberate Resistance: LGBT Prisoner Rights 20 Years After Farmer v. [read post]
14 May 2021, 5:30 am by Kevin
The introduction to the Federal Court of Australia’s opinion in Universal Music Publishing v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 5:01 pm
 Here is how Judge Dee Benson summarized his conclusion in People for the Ethical Treatment of Property Owners v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 4:13 pm by Clerquette LeClerq
 Clerquette is looking for your well-reasoned opinion as to who should move up to the dee-luxe bench at One First Street: Sotomayor, or Kagan. [read post]
1 May 2009, 4:13 pm by Clerquette LeClerq
 Clerquette is looking for your well-reasoned opinion as to who should move up to the dee-luxe bench at One First Street: Sotomayor, or Kagan. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 12:51 pm by Unknown
H.R.1943 - To extend Federal recognition to the Pee Dee Indian Tribe of McColl, South Carolina. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 5:00 pm by Michael Douglas
Akai Pty Ltd v People’s Insurance Co Ltd (1996) 188 CLR 418, 429 (Dawson and McHugh JJ), 445 (Toohey, Gaudron and Gummow JJ). [8] Ibid, quoted in RCD Holdings (n 1) [57]. [9] Ibid, [58]. [10] Ibid. [11] See, eg, British Aerospace plc v Dee Howard Co [1993] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 368; Incitec Ltd v Alkimos Shipping Corp (2004) 138 FCR 496, 506; Australian Health & Nutrition Association Ltd v Hive Marketing Group Pty Ltd (2019) 99 NSWLR 419.… [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 2:29 pm by MBettman
  Upon questioning by the teachers about what happened, L.P. said “Dee did it. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 6:00 am
  The testimony was excluded not on the basis of People v. [read post]