Search for: "People v. Diaz" Results 121 - 140 of 388
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2014, 5:02 am
They were telling them how much money was there, how many people -- or how many victims might be there. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
The California Supreme Court had a precedent from 2011, People v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 2:42 pm by Stephen Bilkis
As the Court of Appeals has explained, where a police officer has probable cause to believe that the driver of an automobile has committed a traffic violation, a stop does not violate the state or federal constitutions and neither the primary motivation of the officer nor a determination of what a reasonable traffic officer would have done under the circumstances is relevant akin to People v Robinson and Whren v United States. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 1:28 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Since Crawford was decided, courts have struggled to come up with a comprehensive definition of the term "testimonial," but one factor that must be considered is the degree to which a statement is deemed accusatory, i.e., whether it seeks to establish facts essential to the elements of the crimes as ruled in People v Encarnacion, Melendez- Diaz v Massachusetts and People v Rawlins. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm by Ron Coleman
 Just watch out when one of us starts blogging about dead people. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 12:18 pm by Hanni Fakhoury
In 2011, he vetoed SB 914, a bill that would have overruled People v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 11:44 am
  You could (and Diaz's counsel does) analogize this to opening an enclosed container in the vehicle, which it's not clear the police can do. [read post]