Search for: "People v. Dillon" Results 21 - 40 of 119
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Shea Denning
Mercado, 307 F.3d 1226, 1229 (10th Cir. 2002) (determining that the automobile exception applied to warrantless search of van that was temporarily inoperable due to mechanical problems) and People v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Notably, the petitioner did not testify that she had directed any of her aides to specifically supervise the student at the time of the incident.Under these circumstances, substantial evidence supports the determination of the Justice Center that the petitioner committed category three neglect (see Matter of Williams v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 151 AD3d at 1356-1357; see also Matter of Kelly v New York State Justice… [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Constitution’s amendment rule, Article V, created high hurdles to constitutional change in an effort to entrench the exclusion of enslaved Africans from “we the people. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 12:25 am
People v Castellano, 41 AD3d 184, 185; People v Carter, 40 AD3d 1310, 1312). [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:32 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Contrary to respondents' contention, the issue here is not likely to recur (see generally id. at 811-812; People v Rikers Is. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:32 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Contrary to respondents' contention, the issue here is not likely to recur (see generally id. at 811-812; People v Rikers Is. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 10:25 am by Guest Blogger
The Supreme Court, however, recognized Congress’s power to fix time limits in Dillon v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm by INFORRM
In Murphy v IRTC Barrington J gave two examples of the common good: the case concerned a ban on religious advertising in section 10(3) of the Radio and Television Act, 1988 (also here), and Barrington J (at [30]) held that the ban in section 10(3) could be justified either to prevent public unrest, or to ensure that, in matters of sensitivity, rich people “should not be able to buy access to the airwaves to the detriment of their poorer rivals”.… [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 7:13 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Barboan (Utilities; Lands – Right of Way; Condemnation)Dillon v. [read post]