Search for: "People v. District Court" Results 41 - 60 of 18,028
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2016, 3:42 pm by Arthur F. Coon
On August 17, 2016, the California Supreme Court ordered the Fourth District’s opinion in People for Proper Planning v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 12:55 am
The new version did provide judicial review, but in a very truncated and limited fashion; hence the court struck it down under Freedman v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 6:54 am by Eric Goldman
Whitepages The post Another Tough People Search Ruling–Spindler v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 5:17 am by Nicholas J. Wagoner
Drummond Co., 552 F.3d 1303, 1315 (11th Cir. 2008); Herero People's Reparations Corp. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 1:53 pm
  The opinion admits that the Fifth District decided otherwise in People v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 9:54 am by Josh Blackman
The 7th Circuit, per Judge Sykes, reversed the District Court’s denial of injunctive relief. [read post]
” “It makes sense to limit litigation between public entities because the people of Iowa foot the bill for both sides. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 12:46 pm
In a major victory for marijuana rights in California, the state supreme court has declined to hear an appeal from prosecutors on the overturned conviction of a marijuana collective operator in People v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 9:52 am by Yolanda J. Bromfield
The post Of All People…: DC District Court Hits Experienced Litigator Defendant With Terminating Sanctions for Failure to Preserve appeared first on Gibbons Law Alert. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 9:52 am by Yolanda J. Bromfield
The post Of All People…: DC District Court Hits Experienced Litigator Defendant With Terminating Sanctions for Failure to Preserve appeared first on Gibbons Law Alert. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 9:52 am by Yolanda J. Bromfield
The post Of All People…: DC District Court Hits Experienced Litigator Defendant With Terminating Sanctions for Failure to Preserve appeared first on Gibbons Law Alert. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 1:12 pm by Stephen Bilkis
However, the prosecution relied on the case of People v. [read post]
” “It makes sense to limit litigation between public entities because the people of Iowa foot the bill for both sides. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 9:44 am
 Here's how Justice Aronson concisely describes the facts of this particular case:"Respondent court denied petitioner’s section 170.6 motion because it concluded the motion was part of the Orange County District Attorney’s (district attorney) coordinated campaign to 'blanket paper' Judge Thomas Goethals to prevent him from hearing murder trials in retaliation for Judge Goethals’s rulings in three earlier murder cases. [read post]