Search for: "People v. District Court of State" Results 121 - 140 of 14,613
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2015, 9:36 am by Frankl & Kominsky, P.A.
Although it did not fully address this question, a recent decision from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Pipino v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 2:34 pm
Commissioner of Social Security, the District Court for the District of New Jersey explains how people suffering from kidney stones can prove a claim for Social Security disability benefits. [read post]
26 May 2015, 10:27 pm by Joey Fishkin
 Every state in the nation currently says, people. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 1:04 am
On Saturday afternoon, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia ruled unconstitutional the District’s absolute prohibition on the carrying of handguns outside the home for lawful self-defense, in the case of Palmer v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 4:33 am
The US Attorney and several prosecutors don't like the fact that they can't send people to jail for a long time under the guidelines or the ACCA because often state court judges will vacate some criminal convictions. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 11:48 pm
On October 3rd of this year, the Supreme Court will entertain arguments is New York State Board of Elections v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 6:17 pm
District Court for the District of New Jersey recently considered a disability claim filed by one Garden State man suffering from the disease. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 8:23 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The district court denied the injunction, and the Court of Appeals affirms.The case is People of the State of New York v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 12:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
Although the Court is not deciding today whether SPP can prevail on this claim, the Court concludes that SPP has included sufficient facts to provide notice to District 211 of a plausible claim under the IRFRA. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
”Each of these three episodes highlights how underexplained the Court’s Trump v Anderson decision last month was. [read post]