Search for: "People v. Dodd"
Results 41 - 60
of 257
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2007, 10:16 pm
DODD: Obviously, national security, keeping the country safe. [read post]
25 May 2011, 1:31 pm
Indeed, this very issue was recently addressed by Judge Leonard Sand in New York in Egan v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 2:42 pm
It is aware of the Fifth Circuit’s recent decision in Asadi v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 8:07 am
It seems the SEC is fixing to impose a fiduciary duty on people who sell securities to customers at arms’ length. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 8:27 am
It has been almost easy to forget that the PHH v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 1:02 pm
Many people mistakenly believe that a whistleblower would have to prove fraud in order to have a SOX or Dodd Frank claim. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 4:40 pm
The inclusion of the brief footage – which was used as background to a report of a planning dispute over fracking operations at Horse Hill in Surrey – resulted from “a catalogue of serious errors by a number of people that should have been, but were not picked up by any of the internal systems and safeguards that were put in place to regulate what is broadcast”, two High Court judges said in a decision R (On the Application Of Finch) v Surrey County Council… [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
Otherwise, the market will have two categories of investors: regular people and people who are friends and families of insiders, said Kim.Avakian agreed. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 6:00 am
Moran v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 9:31 am
In CFPB and People of the State of New York v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 9:31 am
In CFPB and People of the State of New York v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 9:34 am
Lubin, 122 F. 240 (1903).See Mazer v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 5:23 pm
A company's senior people are the typical wrongdoers, she notes. [read post]
Panels Announced: "The Say-on-Pay Workshop Conference: 8th Annual Executive Compensation Conference"
10 May 2011, 4:34 am
The next day, the US District Court - Southern District of New York - in Egan v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 3:48 pm
" Haven't they heard of United States v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 5:00 am
Yet he has not been charged criminally in the case (although 26 other people have, with 21 pleading guilty). [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 4:56 pm
Rather, a journalist should not be penalised for making a wrong decision on a question of meaning on which different people might reasonably take different views. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 11:08 pm
District Court ruling in Pezza v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 5:00 am
”The government attorney directed the Justice to Lawson v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 8:01 am
The two cases are Pulsifer v. [read post]
