Search for: "People v. Doherty"
Results 1 - 20
of 79
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2008, 9:55 pm
So, Doherty (FC) (Appellant) and others v Birmingham City Council (Respondent) [2008] UK HL 57 Well, well, and once more for effect, well. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 6:04 am
On 8 January 2024, the High Court of Northern Ireland handed down judgment in the case of Kelly v O’Doherty [2024] NIMaster 1 [pdf]. [read post]
19 May 2017, 11:01 am
” Doherty pointed to decisions including Robinson v. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 1:16 pm
The latest issue of the libertarian magazine Reason has an interesting essay by Brian Doherty on the briefing in McDonald v. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 9:56 pm
With respect to the merits of defendant's contention that a Frye hearing was required, it is well settled that expert testimony concerning CSAAS is admissible to assist the jury in understanding the unusual conduct of victims of child sexual abuse provided that, as here, the testimony is general in nature and does "not attempt to impermissibly prove that the charged crimes occurred" (People v Carroll, 95 NY2d 375, 387; see People v Gillard, 7 AD3d… [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 2:13 pm
Haven’t seen you around this blog for a while, CLP people. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 3:13 pm
The comments are detailed and very helpful, adding a lot to my scanty commentary, so, for the housing lawyers amongst us, it is well worth reading their comments on my posts on Shala v Birmingham Aweys v Birmingham Omar v Birmingham and now Doherty v Birmingham (House of Lords bound, apparently) And to the CLP people, lovely to see you here, what took you so long? [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 4:09 pm
Critics fear the Tories will now move to cripple Ofcom — and then quietly relax the restrictions on Sky News … THE PRESS GANG campaign — The People v. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 12:32 am
In the nearly five months since the Supreme Court's Second Amendment opinion in D.C. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 5:16 am
Article 3 of Protocol 1 requires that states hold “free elections at reasonable intervals by secret ballot, under conditions which will ensure the free expression of the opinion of the people in the choice of the legislature” (emphasis added). [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 7:00 am
In Barber v Croydon LBC [2010] EWCA Civ 51, the Court of Appeal found Croydon’s decision to pursue possession proceedings of a non-secure tenancy occupied by Mr Barber Wednesbury unreasonable, being by my estimation the third such successful use of a gateway (b) defence in the higher courts (after Doherty itself and McGlynn). [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 8:43 pm
============================================Some interesting background here on the Citizens United v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 11:21 am
Allen’s case is Allen v. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 2:25 am
Lynn LoPucki is one of those people. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm
In Murphy v IRTC Barrington J gave two examples of the common good: the case concerned a ban on religious advertising in section 10(3) of the Radio and Television Act, 1988 (also here), and Barrington J (at [30]) held that the ban in section 10(3) could be justified either to prevent public unrest, or to ensure that, in matters of sensitivity, rich people “should not be able to buy access to the airwaves to the detriment of their poorer rivals”.… [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 7:34 am
G owned a piece of land which (known as "Doherty's field") which fitted into the L to make a rectangle. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 7:34 am
G owned a piece of land which (known as "Doherty's field") which fitted into the L to make a rectangle. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 10:00 pm
FSIS Administrator Alfred “Al” V. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
The route to get there varies, although it will normally take in Awua, Pereira, Runa Begum, Din v Wandsworth, Monk, Kay (x2), Doherty, Quick v Taff Ely, Pye (x2), Uratemp, and so on. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
The route to get there varies, although it will normally take in Awua, Pereira, Runa Begum, Din v Wandsworth, Monk, Kay (x2), Doherty, Quick v Taff Ely, Pye (x2), Uratemp, and so on. [read post]
