Search for: "People v. Dooley" Results 1 - 20 of 36
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by Stephen M. Bainbridge
Having said that, however, the time and effort expended to date are sunk costs.[12] Granted, many people are not very good at ignoring sunk costs.[13] Ignoring sunk costs, however, is precisely what rational decision makers – including the ALI – ought to do.[14] The basic problem with the proposed Restatement of the Law of Corporate Governance is that corporate law is not a suitable subject for being restated. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 2:53 am by Walter Olson
You can use state power, ultimately the barrel of a gun, to compel people to do what you think is right. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 6:15 am by Marty Lederman
Stripped of his livelihood . . . and his crown Mere hours after Ali’s refusal, the chairman of the New York State Athletic Commission, Edwin Dooley, announced that the Commission had withdrawn Ali’s license to fight on the ground that licensing a man who refused induction was “detrimental to the best interests of boxing”; the commission also withdrew its recognition of Ali as world heavyweight champion. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 12:58 pm by Andrew Delaney
The US Supreme Court decided a case called J.D.B. v. [read post]