Search for: "People v. Dooley" Results 21 - 36 of 36
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by Stephen M. Bainbridge
Having said that, however, the time and effort expended to date are sunk costs.[12] Granted, many people are not very good at ignoring sunk costs.[13] Ignoring sunk costs, however, is precisely what rational decision makers – including the ALI – ought to do.[14] The basic problem with the proposed Restatement of the Law of Corporate Governance is that corporate law is not a suitable subject for being restated. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 6:15 am by Marty Lederman
Stripped of his livelihood . . . and his crown Mere hours after Ali’s refusal, the chairman of the New York State Athletic Commission, Edwin Dooley, announced that the Commission had withdrawn Ali’s license to fight on the ground that licensing a man who refused induction was “detrimental to the best interests of boxing”; the commission also withdrew its recognition of Ali as world heavyweight champion. [read post]
14 May 2010, 1:22 pm by WIMS
PSD and title V requirements at these thresholds would lead to dramatic increases in the number of required permits -- tens of thousands of PSD permits and millions of title V permits. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
Over the last few months, we here at Abnormal Use have corresponded regularly with our friends at the Drug and Device Law blog, most notably Steve McConnell and Jim Beck, about both the law and popular culture. [read post]