Search for: "People v. Downing (1985)" Results 41 - 60 of 506
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2022, 12:56 pm by Elena Kagan, Alan Z. Rozenshtein
The plaintiffs emphasized that the defendants could be held liable under even the highly speech-protective standard of Brandenburg v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 11:17 am by Lisa A. Mazzie
As well, three of those cases were handed down on June 26—Lawrence on 6/26/03; Windsor on 6/26/13; Obergefell on 6/26/15). [read post]
3 May 2022, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
In light of this week’s leak of Samuel Alito’s draft opinion by which the Supreme Court will soon overrule Roe v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 1:59 am by Matrix Law
On Wednesday 7th December the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in REFERENCE by the Attorney General for Northern Ireland – Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (Northern Ireland) Bill [2022] UKSC 32. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 6:38 am by Kenji Yoshino
Cleburne Living Center, 1985); and lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals (Romer v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 7:25 am by Ronald Collins
” That was about 1985 and his papers had just been processed at the Library of Congress. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 11:41 am by NL
London Borough of Brent v Tudor [2013] EWCA Civ 157This was an appeal of a Circuit Judge’s finding that LB Brent’s possession claim under Ground 16, Schedule 2 Housing Act 1985 failed because the property was reasonably needed to accommodate those living there. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 11:41 am by NL
London Borough of Brent v Tudor [2013] EWCA Civ 157This was an appeal of a Circuit Judge’s finding that LB Brent’s possession claim under Ground 16, Schedule 2 Housing Act 1985 failed because the property was reasonably needed to accommodate those living there. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 4:15 am by Michael Posluns
Canada when Justice Phelan handed down his decision in the Federal Court under the title “Chicken Little v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 10:50 pm
Hounslow argued that decisions on provision of social housing can only be challenged by way of judicial review, citing O’Rourke v Camden LBC [1998] A.C. 188, in which the House of Lords struck out a claim for damages for a failure to accommodate as homeless pursuant to s.63(1) Housing Act 1985. [read post]
24 May 2013, 1:51 am
  Karpov v Kasparov (1985): black to play and win  The art assets of the game are protected as artistic works. [read post]