Search for: "People v. Dukes (1969)" Results 1 - 16 of 16
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
For instance: Janus holds that the First Amendment generally bars compelling people to turn over money to a private organization that will use it for speech.[9] But Rumsfeld v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 2:07 pm by Eugene Volokh
Duke University professor Jeff Powell sent me the following response to my post on Brummer v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 5:43 am by Bernard Bell
FCC, 395 U.S. 367, 389-90 (1969).[2] Section 317 of the Act, 47 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 12:23 pm by SCOTUSblog
He was a long-time member of the Duke Law School faculty, which he joined in 1969. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” (This latter point becomes the focus of my later essay on A Mantra in Search of Meaning, also published as part of a symposium, this one at the University of North Carolina Law School celebrating the 40th anniversary of Baker v. [read post]
”[5] At the same time, the SEC found, such disclosure would “promote the purposes of” the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (“NEPA”), which was adopted months before President Nixon created the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”). [read post]