Search for: "People v. Durham"
Results 1 - 20
of 174
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2014, 2:33 pm
People v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 8:41 am
The Intelligence Community’s Assessment that Russia Interfered in the 2016 Election to Benefit Trump In 2019, the New York Times reported that Durham is investigating the intelligence community’s conclusion that “President Vladimir V. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 3:56 pm
Jean Carroll v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 12:38 pm
Most of the people added were "from heavily black areas of Durham—increasing the district's BVAP... [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 4:20 am
Arrigoni Enterprises, LLC v Town of Durham, 18 F. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 4:20 am
Arrigoni Enterprises, LLC v Town of Durham, 18 F. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 10:03 pm
Specifically, in U.S. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 2:00 am
The Durham Herald Sun reported this week that felony charges against eight people allegedly involved in destroying a Confederate monument in downtown Durham last summer have been dismissed. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:49 pm
” A procedural reminder: this appeal, which Judge Beaty granted despite the only on-point precedent coming from the Middle District of Alabama, involves the City’s attempt to have the case dismissed before any discovery occurs. ---------------- One reason, perhaps, for Durham’s aggressive attempt to overturn Judge Beaty’s decision came last week, when the Supreme Court considered a grand jury immunity case, Rehberg v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 8:58 pm
Indeed, the brief notes that one case on which Durham relied (Wray v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:18 am
That all changed once Commonwealth v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 11:16 am
[Hat Tip: Co-Blogger Bob V]Original content copyright © InsureBlog [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 8:14 pm
And the Durham brief doesn’t mention that at least one of her “physical descriptions” from the March 16 meeting didn’t match any player on the lacrosse team, while those descriptions also didn’t even remotely resemble at least two of the people ultimately charged. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
The test has altered little since the 19th century, when in the 1885 case of Durham v Durham, it was stated: the contract of marriage is a very simple one, which does not require a high degree of intelligence to comprehend. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 5:26 pm
I’d love to hear from people who know more about this case. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 12:14 pm
To take one example: in a high-profile 2011 decision, Henry v. [read post]
17 Jun 2007, 3:31 pm
Nifong may be immune, thanks to Imbler v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 5:42 pm
As of today, the F/V AMERICAN TRIUMPH, and F/V AMERICAN DYNASTY have reportedly returned to fishing. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 11:44 am
State v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:28 am
Over the past couple of years, there has been a great deal of discussion — particularly in relation to the Durham Statement [1] — about technical standards and preservation issues for law reviews that publish openly and exclusively online. [read post]
