Search for: "People v. Dutch"
Results 61 - 80
of 440
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2022, 1:14 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. (5th Cir. 2004). [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
| The IPKat and his friends | GO Outdoors Ltd v Skechers USA Inc II | Allfiled UK Ltd v Eltis & 16 Others | OAEE 'victims' mark in Greece | Icons, flags and the Hazzards of intellectual property toxicity | Why Finland is not Silicon Valley | The Sofa Workshop Ltd v Sofaworks Ltd | The Ukulele Orchestra of Great Britain v Clausen & Another (t/a the United Kingdom Ukulele Orchestra) | Sony/ATV Music… [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 9:32 am
I understand how different people may reach a different conclusion, but I can't see how that becomes a cause of action. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 10:20 am
In Atlantic v. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 11:32 am
After the Morrison v. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 2:47 am
The IPEG post places this decision within the context of Dutch case law. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:17 am
They also cite Sosa v. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 9:15 am
Compare other more or less imitative verbs with final -ump , e.g. bump v.1, dump v.1, stump v.1, thump v., etc. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 6:00 pm
The latest decision in our old friend, Astiana v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 7:12 am
Manning as an amicus in Sebelius v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 12:19 am
This includes, but is not limited to, law books -- some of which concern intellectual property, and some of which are written by people of the highest repute. [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 4:00 am
At least two people must be responsible for the insurance company's day-to-day policy. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
In Cruzan v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 7:06 am
That case is now going to the Dutch Supreme Court. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 1:49 pm
Eleven babies die after Dutch women given Viagra-like drug in trial. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 7:35 am
In order to be able to stop other people using the idea (without asking the person who first had it) the idea must have been new, and must not have been too easy for other people (even people who knew a lot about the area of the idea) to have arrived at, at the time when we first asked to be allowed to stop other people from using it without asking. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 8:48 am
Five years ago, in Kiobel v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 4:32 pm
Kahn v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 4:06 am
This is partly the question in Kiobel v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 7:30 am
By way of illustration, Ministry of Justice statistics for 2010/11 show that 40.6% of the people searched under section 60 were black, 26.3% were white, and 22% were Asian. [read post]
