Search for: "People v. Duty"
Results 21 - 40
of 9,376
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2018, 3:14 am
” In Collier v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 7:41 am
See, McLeod v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 2:32 pm
While a person typically has no duty to protect people from third-party harm, there are certain situations in which the lines blur and the rules become tricky. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 8:30 am
In Ruiz v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 11:42 am
In Dix v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 9:25 am
” People v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 2:38 pm
People always complain about being called for jury duty. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 11:13 am
Zaman v Waltham Forest LBC Waltham had accepted that it owed Ms Zaman the full housing duty in October 2020. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 8:32 am
State of Vermont v. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 2:14 pm
The California Supreme Court recently ruled in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 9:07 am
v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 1:31 pm
Melevsky v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 9:51 pm
Aug. 29, 2008)(Willett) (premises liability, owner liability for crime on property, forseeability, no duty)TRAMMELL CROW CENTRAL TEXAS, LTD. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:17 am
Co. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 2:12 am
Grainger plc v Nicholson UKEAT/219/09; [2009] WLR (D) 315 “An asserted philosophical belief that mankind was heading towards catastrophic climate change and therefore people were under a moral duty to lead their lives in a manner which mitigated or avoided that catastrophe for the benefit of future generations, and to persuade others to do the same, [...] [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 4:42 pm
"[T]rial counsel's duty of effective assistance includes the responsibility to advise the defendant concerning the exercise of [the] constitutional right" to testify at trial (Brown v Artuz, 124 F3d 73, 74, cert denied 522 US 1128; see People v Carpenter, 52 AD3d 729, lv denied 11 NY3d 830; People v Perry, 266 AD2d 151, 152, lv denied 95 NY2d 856). [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 8:34 am
In the case of Idrogo v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 3:28 am
” Coffman v. [read post]
