Search for: "People v. Ellis" Results 301 - 320 of 356
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2009, 8:54 am
  Latest pursuit: I am the VP of the Ellis County Bar Association and we are finally setting up an online presence for members and the citizens of Ellis County. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 10:39 am
People on a bus who were misbehaving as the bus passed through a council estate would, for example, not be caught by s.153A; bricks put through a window of an owner-occupied property would not be caught unless the perpetrator was a tenant; (c) this narrow definition made sense because, in any other factual situation, the council could (and should) seek an ASBO instead – see Birmingham City Council v Shafi and Ellis [2008] EWCA 1186 (our note here). [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:27 am
In January of 2000, the Supreme Court of the United States decided the case of Weeks v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:27 am
In January of 2000, the Supreme Court of the United States decided the case of Weeks v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:27 am
In January of 2000, the Supreme Court of the United States decided the case of Weeks v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:36 pm
We don't mind people saying we're full of it, we couldn't be litigators if we did, but that should be decided on the strength of our arguments, not on which side of the "v" we reside. [read post]
21 May 2009, 10:29 am
” And the Journal notes but does not discuss the fact that Jay Lefkowitz of Kirkland & Ellis who led the Bush Administration’s efforts to shield drug companies from lawsuits when their products harmed people now represents drug companies in litigation (no surprise there). [read post]
13 May 2009, 4:05 pm
On this point, the Chancellor, relied on the principles in a 1901 English Court of Appeal ruling in Duke of Bedford v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 10:30 am
This is the court, remember, that directly and deliberately defied the United States Supreme Court in Miller-El v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 9:07 pm
Ellis, a detainees’ lawyer from Boston, asserted that the government “wants to expand the categories of people who may be detained” beyond what international law would allow. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
" Vice Chancellor Donald Parsons, Jr.: "Delaware decisions like Caremark and Stone v. [read post]