Search for: "People v. Ellis (1999)" Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2009, 8:36 pm
We don't mind people saying we're full of it, we couldn't be litigators if we did, but that should be decided on the strength of our arguments, not on which side of the "v" we reside. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:15 am by Steve Lombardi
Very few people would disagree that a valid reason for awarding punitive damages is to compensate the injured person for the indignity of the perpetrator’s act and that is reason enough to allow the claim to proceed against the estate. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 12:04 pm by Elina Saxena, Quinta Jurecic
A suicide bomber killed three people and wounded several others in an attack on a Saudi mosque, according to Saudi state television. [read post]
28 Aug 2006, 6:47 am
That carefully composed legal opinion makes it somewhat hard for a judge's critics to convince people — especially anyone who likes the outcome — that the judge did not decide the case according to an unbiased legal method of analysis. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
Levy, and presents a 1999 article, A Common-Law Model for Religious Exemption. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 2:37 pm by Howard Knopf
”  This leads to the confusing, arguably counterfactual and certainly counterintuitive conclusion that:The Board certified 852 different tariffs in respect of the 15-year study period between 1999 and 2013. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Comunicaciones_MJ
Así fue cómo Thurgood Marshall —el destacado jurista, activista y principal abogado del caso Brown v. [read post]