Search for: "People v. Epstein" Results 1 - 20 of 241
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2014, 11:48 am by UChicagoLaw
On Defining Ideas, Richard Epstein asks, "who has the final say on affirmative action in public institutions, the people or the courts? [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 12:58 pm by UChicagoLaw
On the other hand, it is often treated, most notably under the Supreme Court’s now pivotal decision in Penn Central Transportation Co v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 12:58 pm by UChicagoLaw
On the other hand, it is often treated, most notably under the Supreme Court’s now pivotal decision in Penn Central Transportation Co v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 9:10 am by David Lat
So how would you react to learning of a three-way debate between Wurtzel, Epstein, and Yoo — in which the dynamic is not La Wurtzel v. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 7:34 am by Paul Cassell
By ignoring the "rights creating" language found in the CVRA, the Eleventh Circuit en banc misapplied Alexander v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 8:24 pm by Mike
 Thus, a criminal case reads: People of the State of California v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
” [NY Post quoting plaintiff's lawyer Charen Kim] Richard Epstein: Massachusetts buffer zone statute “should have been upheld, not struck down” [Hoover Institution, earlier on McCullen v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 11:24 am by Steve Bainbridge
There are some people who are both, but neither group is represented in large numbers. [read post]
3 May 2013, 9:50 am by JB
Last week Richard Epstein and I were on a panel at AEI on the New Deal Constitution, commemorating the 75th anniversary of the decisions in Erie Railroad v. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 1:21 pm
L. art. 5 (2006), available at http://www.bepress.com/jtl/vol1/iss1/art5/ (link).It's nice to see him make it again, particularly with Wyeth v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 3:06 am
" That's at the opposite end of the spectrum from the clear rule that Justice Scalia articulated in Employment Division v. [read post]