Search for: "People v. Every"
Results 101 - 120
of 16,425
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2019, 12:04 pm
So, yep, other people have used the same term. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 2:50 pm
Maybe every single judge did what was totally within their discretion to do. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 4:00 am
In Mora v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 4:00 am
In Mora v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 12:24 pm
Plenty of people have stupid belt buckles. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 11:52 am
History Through the Eyes of Everyday People. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 11:30 am
And the Supreme Court is likely to further gut abortion rights, even if it doesn’t immediately overturn Roe v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 3:00 pm
Because we want a neutral magistrate to decide -- except in the most extreme cases -- whether circumstances truly warrant (pun intended) making people no longer "secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 1:45 pm
But notice that the caption is "People v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 8:04 am
The process is incremental, and every single step counts. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 11:28 am
As a result, I can understand the temptation to adopt an internal "no footnotes" rule.But today's opinion by Justice Cuellar amply demonstrates the pitfalls of such a principle.Here are just the first three paragraphs of the opinion:"According to the Center for Sex Offender Management (CSOM), one in every five girls and one in every seven boys is sexually abused by the time they reach adulthood. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 11:44 am
The Court of Appeal pretty much rejects her argument on every ground imaginable; on the merits, harmless error, etc.You can see where Justice Hollenhorst is coming from. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 9:26 pm
The case, Grants Pass v. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 7:23 am
The State Attorney General can also bring an action for an injunction against the greedy photocopy people. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 9:04 pm
” Howell v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 2:24 pm
What’s more, LGBTQ+ people are overrepresented at every stage of the criminal legal system. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 8:26 am
In People v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 8:15 am
These voter restrictions are the result of the Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 10:58 am
Holding that because we know that the Legislature didn't want people shooting at cars, this legislative history "breaks the tie" and means -- as in virtually every case -- that the rule of lenity is meaningless.Of course, the Legislature probably didn't want people shooting at an occupied vehicle from inside a vehicle as well -- since that may well have the same consequences (death, broken glass, car crashes, etc.) as shooting from… [read post]
12 May 2009, 8:37 pm
X appeals to the NY Court of Appeals, which ruled 4-3 today (People v. [read post]
