Search for: "People v. Favor" Results 101 - 120 of 11,565
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2016, 1:25 pm
 And a favorable deal:"The prosecution charged defendant by felony complaint with oral copulation with a minor. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 9:44 am
 If your ability to hear criminal cases at all -- your area of practice and interest -- depends on the district attorney's favor, your recognition of that reality is something that never goes away.Now, maybe that's a good thing. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 1:05 pm
"  This, by the way, was better (or at least more favorable to the prosecution) than the defendant's previous offer, which was to confess to various unsolved crimes in return for "a segregated cell with a television, $200 in his inmate trust account, a double bacon cheeseburger, strawberry milkshake, and chili pork burrito, stamped envelopes, legal pads, pencils, media contacts, and an exclusive interview. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 2:49 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Finally, it was settled in People v Lawrence that recantation evidence is unreliable. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 6:50 pm by Danielle Wild
Candidate at Syracuse University College of Law and Intern at Easton Thompson Kasperek Shiffrin LLPYesterday, the New York Court of Appeals decided People v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:27 am by Jon
Supreme Court announced its decision today in McDonald v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 12:47 pm
Unless the Krazy Krowd 13 and 18th Street gangs tend to favor "short and balding" as the current style. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 2:05 pm
We recently rejected a similar argument in People v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 5:27 pm by Madelaine Lane
On Wednesday, January 12, 2011, the Michigan Supreme Court denied one application for leave to appeal and held the case of People v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 11:06 am
Each found in favor of the government and against the criminal defendant.No splits here. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 7:15 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Foreclosure Opinions Body: AC36962 - People’s United Bank v. [read post]