Search for: "People v. Fields (1979)" Results 21 - 40 of 155
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2022, 7:39 pm
  And indeed, sometimes a bad decision in a court produces a substantially good consequences in the arena of politics (theory discussed in Backer, Chroniclers in the Field of Cultural Production: Courts, Law, and the Interpretive Process Boston College Third World Law Journal 20:291-343 (2000). [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 8:02 am by Adam Klein
 For example, his 2012 dissent in Lafler v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 8:58 am by Joe Consumer
Mary’s L.J. 399 (1979) at 400, n. 9.) [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 12:09 pm by Peter Groves
A digression to draw lessons from trade mark law (exclusion of shapes which achieve a technical function), which seems a bit left-field, reinforces the Advocate General's view.There's more to the Opinion, but that will have to suffice for now. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 11:55 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
Indeed, after 1975 the Court delivered a series of landmark judgments, including, for example, Golder v UK (1975), Engel v the Netherlands (1976), Tyrer v UK (1978), Marckx v Belgium (1979) and Sunday Times v UK (1979). [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
People might have been unaware in 1979 that the telephone company would keep records of the local phone numbers that each person dialed. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:44 pm by Reference Staff
Village of Bellwood, 441 U.S. 91 (1979), and Havens Realty Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:29 pm by Lawrence Taylor
Texas This 1979 court case doesn’t directly pertain to DUI checkpoints, but it did help shape them. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 12:06 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Indeed, that is why all witnesses—lay or expert—are called: to get what they know about the case that other people do not. [read post]