Search for: "People v. Fine (1997)"
Results 1 - 20
of 243
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2024, 6:55 am
In Tuskia v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am
Martin Wells set out to do a meta-analysis, which was all fine and good. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:01 am
Trial in The People of the State of New York vs. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
" (NSBA v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Lanier, 520 U.S. 259, 270-71 (1997), and, if only private individuals are charged, must be one that protects against private interference (rather than having a state-action element), see United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 7:15 am
CAfA’s 223 arbitrators have extensive experience with dispute resolution, and specialization in areas such as art authenticity, restitution of cultural property, insurance or sale transactions related to fine art – to name a few.[12] Another unique feature is that CAfA assembles an “Expert Witness Pool. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 12:30 pm
Friends, we are excited to share that the Supreme Court has just taken up Gonzalez v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:07 am
Many copyright scholars and most in the world of fine art have loudly condemned the ruling as a travesty of justice. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 8:41 am
The University of Chicago law school website shows 62 "full time reaching faculty" v. 127 "Lecturers in Law" (another—and, to some ears, a more dignified—term for adjuncts). [read post]
3 May 2023, 2:20 am
They were Baptists, and since moving to Oryol in 2005 they had regularly invited people to their home for prayer and Bible reading [1-5]. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
Moreover, Congress later endorsed the FDA’s broad reading in 1997 when it codified the FDA’s rules in the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 1:14 pm
Published Decisions R v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 9:31 am
Since 2003, there has been a 44% increase in disability claims filed by people previously in the workplace. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 1:11 pm
If charged summarily, the maximum punishment is 2 years less a day imprisonment and/or a $5000 fine. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 10:32 am
Cases such as R v Nygaard, 1989 CanLII 6 (SCC), [1989] 2 SCR 1074, R v Jacquard, 1997 CanLII 374 (SCC), [1997] 1 SCR 314, and R v More, 1963 CanLII 805 (MBCA) have helped us establish notions of what “planned and deliberate” murder entails. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am
Booze and Christmas also played a role in 1997’s DeGraff v. [read post]
25 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
The topic of malapportionment is well-trodden ground, with established measures borne both of legal necessity following Baker v. [read post]
