Search for: "People v. Ford (1985)" Results 1 - 20 of 58
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2011, 9:28 am by Eric
The court considered previous decisions where a range of intermediaries, including real estate agents (Butcher v Lachlan Elder Realty Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 60), television broadcasters (Universal Telecasters (Qld) Ltd v Guthrie [1978] FCA 9) and newspapers (Australian Ocean Line Pty Ltd v West Australian Newspapers Ltd [(1985) [1985] FCA 37), had not been liable for misleading and deceptive conduct for merely displaying advertising. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 8:56 am by Anthony Gaughan
Ford and Panetti say incompetent people can’t be executed. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 2:17 pm by Patricia Hughes
[See CTV News Story here and decision in Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 10:54 pm
Libbey-Owens Ford Co., 758 F.2d 613, 624 (Fed. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 9:02 pm by Josephine A. Phillips
This shift, Ford argued, may repair the “bonds between state and all the people it is meant to serve. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 12:17 pm by pfriedman
To support his reasoning, Judge Jacobs pointed out first that the use of bad faith in fair use analysis had its origins in the Supreme Court’s 1985 decision in Harper & Row v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 1:37 pm
Montoya de Hernandez, 473 U.S. 531, 538 (1985). [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]