Search for: "People v. Franklyn"
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2010, 5:28 am
U.S. population is experiencing instability, inequity and insecurity not seen since Franklyn D. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 11:54 am
Kodiak Cakes, LLC v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 10:07 am
" (See the uncited study by Franklyn and Hyman supporting this analysis). [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 12:31 pm
More were able to recognize corporate v. peer source but not near 100%. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 1:13 pm
” 1-800 Contacts tried to rebut this by citing the Hyman/Franklyn study–curious, because I cite that study for the direct opposite proposition that many consumers want and expect ads from multiple vendors for trademarked search queries. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 10:15 am
In Silsby v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:34 am
Duffy was co-counsel in the important Supreme Court case KSR v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 3:10 am
By Eric Goldman 1-800 Contacts, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 7:50 am
People translate to synonyms all the time. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm
David Hyman & David Franklyn A couple of small empirical studies and armchair empiricism; lots of regulatory interest. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 7:52 am
Simpson Strong-Tie Co. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 9:57 am
Since then, some empirical studies have supported this argument, especially the Franklyn/Hyman study; see also the Tucker/Bechtold study. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 2:08 pm
Franklyn, Trademarks as Search-Engine Keywords: Who, What, When? [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm
Exxon survey: Nike v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:21 pm
If process claims are available, and relevant to consumers, in many more contexts than previously realized, among other things that has implications for the First Amendment treatment of advertising regulation—compare the claims made in the Nike v. [read post]
