Search for: "People v. Freitas" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2016, 2:40 pm
 I'm certain -- or at least hope -- that this opinion corrects this practice.Though, in the meantime, there are all these people, like Mr. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
The shipping agency company secretary said he was left close to a nervous breakdown and was shunned by a number of people. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 2:25 pm by Xandra Kramer
The collective action was aimed representing people in the Netherlands, but was extended to people who have moved abroad during the procedure, and these are under the opt-in rule. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
On the Defendants’ section 4 public interest defence, Nicklin J relied on Warby J’s questions from Economou v David de Freitas [2018] EWCA Civ 2591 [87]: was the statement complained of, or did it form part of, a statement on a matter of public interest? [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Following the order, in 2012, Serafin became involved with Kolbe House, a care home for elderly Polish people, as a handyman. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
  The following matters are listed for next term Economou v De Freitas  13 June 2016, listed for 6-10 days [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
The case provides some Supreme Court guidance on section 4, largely endorsing the decision in Alexander Economou v David de Freitas [2018] EWCA Civ 2591, whilst adding some refinement on the legal analysis provided therein. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
There may be some other way in which the hypothetical ordinary reasonable reader would identify him/her: Economou v de Freitas [2017] EMLR 4, [2016] EWHC 1853 (QB) (27 July 2016) [9] … 21. [read post]
9 Dec 2018, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
The Brett Wilson Media Law Blog has commented on decision in the case of Economou v De Freitas which provides guidance on what constitutes a matter of public interest as a defence (pursuant to s.4 Defamation Act 2013) in defamation cases. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
In other words, he considered that “minimum interference” option which forms the third stage of Lord Clyde’s threefold analysis in  de Freitas v  Permanent Secretary of Ministry of Agriculture, Fishing, Lands and Housing (1998)  had no part to play in this case. [read post]
22 May 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Davies doorstepped convicted fraudster Neelam Desai once and sent her two emails over claims she had conned people out of thousands of pounds. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
The Guardian has an article considering how social media and the celebrity culture is “harming young people”. [read post]
24 May 2022, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
  If a claimant has lied in their pleadings or evidence, they could face contempt proceedings or a prosecution for perjury – rare, but not unheard of (see R v Jeffrey Archer and R v Jonathan Aitkin). [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Last week in the Courts On Monday 13 June 2016, the trial in Economou v De Freitas began before Warby J. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
ON 23 March 2022 Collins Rice J handed down judgment in the case of United the Union v Freitas [2022] EWHC 666 (QB). [read post]