Search for: "People v. Freund" Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
And Frankfurter has got to be bothered by the fact that Mark said in 1976 that the "time has come to blow the whistle on the Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court"-presumably because the volumes have been taking too long to get out, since Frankfurter and Freund assigned them to the wrong people. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
People will not view our history as merely some more books by some more professors,” he wrote to Freund in 1966. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 9:59 am
"[The doctor] did not create Freund's painful mental disorder and his traumatizing social isolation," The ruling in Greenberg v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 6:00 am by The Dear Rich Staff
Two years after the Koons case, the Supreme Court recast fair use in Campbell v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
  To take one example: many people have tried to explain to me how holding companies work, but Mark, at page 970, is the only person who has succeeded. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 1:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Even exclusion based on fear of violent reaction might well be unconstitutional, even in a limited public forum, see Sonnier v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 3:35 am
Larry O'Dell, Associated Press Writer, Richmond, Va. wrote about a recent Virginia Court of Appeals ruling, Stroud v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Ct. 1731, 1755 (2020) (Alito, J., dissenting) (statutory words “mean what they conveyed to reasonable people at the time they were written” (citation omitted)); Kisor v. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]