Search for: "People v. Galle"
Results 1 - 20
of 125
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2008, 6:55 am
From Doug Berman, the Second Circuit's en banc decision in U.S. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 2:02 pm
Applying Gall v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 11:42 pm
” I doubt the bear medicine actually helps people, but it’s definitely not good for the bears. [read post]
9 May 2012, 6:59 am
At the Volokh Conspiracy, David Post discusses Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 6:19 pm
People v Galle, 77 NY2d 953, 955-956). [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
Booker and Gall v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 12:58 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 6:38 am
In United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 10:08 am
Cox and UMG v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 12:25 am
People v Rosas, 8 NY3d 493, 499), the mens rea and actus reus in depraved indifference circumstances need not necessarily be simultaneous (see generally People v Kibbe, 35 NY2d 407; People v Galle, 77 NY2d 953 [criminally negligent homicide]). [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
It was legal for 48 years straight—from the Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 9:32 am
United States, 551 U.S. 338 (2007), Gall v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 6:16 am
Ct. at 1235; Gall, 552 U.S. at 57. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 1:35 pm
The gall of some people, right? [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 10:06 am
Inside the curious case of Dawn Dorland v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:48 pm
" [George Sutherland, Euclid v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 12:26 pm
Great immigration lawyer that he is, Gabe raised a particularly galling example of how U.S. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 12:26 pm
Great immigration lawyer that he is, Gabe raised a particularly galling example of how U.S. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 3:22 pm
In addition, the Moritz Law School at Ohio State has begun a series of podcasts where their faculty discuss Supreme Court cases, and SCOTUSwiki case pages now feature links to the podcasts in all of the relevant cases (for example, see this page about Gall v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 8:45 am
That’s because last year in Carpenter v. [read post]
