Search for: "People v. Garcia (1983)"
Results 21 - 39
of 39
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
District Court for the Eastern District of California Garcia v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
District Court for the Eastern District of California Garcia v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
Baze v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 4:49 am
Hansen, 701 F. 2d 1078 (2nd Cir. 1983); US v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Supreme Court, January 07, 2008 Arave v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 11:46 am
Garcia, 474 F.3d 994 (7th Cir. 2007) (Posner, J.); and United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Supreme Court, January 22, 2008 Ali v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 4:45 am
County of San Diego, No. 05-56202Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations does not create judicially enforceable rights that may be vindicated by an individual in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. section 1983. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
City of New York , No. 06-1983 Read more... [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:50 am
” People v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
W.C.A.B. (1983) 33 Cal. 3d 585, to find the employer liable even though the violent incident, which resulted in applicant’s death, occurred on a public street after applicant finished work. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
" U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, February 05, 2008 Garcia-Meza v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Garcia, No. 07-40245 A conviction for drug-related offenses is reversed and remanded for a new trial where: 1) during rebuttal closing argument, the government improperly bolstered its key witnesses, the agents who heard defendant's unrecorded confession; and 2) such bolstering constituted reversible plain error, which seriously affected the fairness, integrity, and public reputation of the proceedings. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, April 17, 2009 US v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Garcia-Alvarez, No. 071471, 071697 Conviction for carjacking and firearms offenses is affirmed over claims of error that: 1) the evidence proffered against defendant was not sufficient; and 2) the district court erred in denying defendant's motion for a new trial. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 11:11 am
Royer, 460 U.S. 491, 497-98, 103 S.Ct. 1319, 1324, 75 L.Ed.2d 229 (1983); State v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
BLIX STREET RECORDS, INC. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
BLIX STREET RECORDS, INC. v. [read post]
28 May 2022, 2:25 pm
First, it’s ridiculous to call the Castle Rock v. [read post]
