Search for: "People v. Garcia (1999)"
Results 1 - 20
of 46
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 6:50 pm
Generations of people in the community were poisoned by lead, arsenic and other toxic substances, resulting in a devastating array of physical and mental illnesses and in some cases, death. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 10:02 am
According to Valencia v. [read post]
28 May 2022, 2:25 pm
First, it’s ridiculous to call the Castle Rock v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 1:13 pm
June 13) (suggesting that mentioning a felony coupled with "the omission to mention the reversal of the conviction" could be libelous); see also Garcia v. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 2:37 pm
Was more heavily used 1999-2003. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 8:16 pm
& Loan Assoc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 11:11 am
Velasquez, 994 S.W.2d 676, 678 (Tex.Crim.App.1999). [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm
Herrera-Garcia v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 1:59 pm
For the two-week February sitting, which has trickled into the first week of March, most people would pick Wednesday’s abortion case, June Medical Services LLC v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:56 pm
Garcia (2002) 97 Cal.App.4th 847, 853, which quoted Lewis v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Ramos v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 8:10 pm
Garcia (1999) 21 Cal.4th 1, 14.) [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 1:17 pm
People v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 6:48 am
This post examines an opinion from the Appellate Court of Illinois – Fifth Division: People v. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 7:53 pm
In Garcia v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:28 am
One swarm may last for months up to well over a year, depending on the popularity of the work, and people may leave and re-enter the same swarm at any time. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 8:36 am
National Academies 1999 digital dilemma report—computer scientists said repro. rt shouldn’t be focus. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
In Mills, the plaintiff claimed that, due to a variant gene (“CYP”), she could not metabolize the defendant’s drug as well as most other people. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 8:20 pm
Not every gunshot ineluctably results in serious physical injury (see, People v Gray, 30 AD3d 771 [3rd Dept 2006] [victim shot with shotgun from 20 feet away, evidence insufficient to establish serious physical injury]; see also, People v Rojas, 61 NY2d 726 [1984] [gunshot injury does not by itself establish substantial pain as required for physical injury]; People v Francis, 112 AD2d 167 [2nd Dept 1985] [same]; People v… [read post]
