Search for: "People v. Garcia (2000)"
Results 21 - 40
of 52
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2016, 12:51 pm
State v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 8:56 am
Tomaydo also asserts that the menu items are purposefully coordinated with each other, but never identifies any creative manner by which they are. * I never got the chance to blog the Ninth Circuit’s en banc opinions in Garcia v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:28 am
Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit 2000) (quoting U.S. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 4:46 am
” The title itself comes from the case Joel v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 7:18 am
People v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 9:06 am
Garcia v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 1:00 am
In November 2000, the High Court (Laws LJ and Gibbs J) gave judgment in favour of Mr Bancoult, a Chagos Islander, in granting a High Court order quashing the Immigration Ordinance 1971, s 4; see R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2001] QB 1067 (“Bancoult (1)”). [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks | BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan.Never too late 50 [week ending on Sunday 7 June] - Swiss claims | Italian-sounding trade marks for cosmetics | “IP… [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
In Mills, the plaintiff claimed that, due to a variant gene (“CYP”), she could not metabolize the defendant’s drug as well as most other people. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 8:20 pm
Likewise, the circumstances of some shootings, by their nature, can establish the defendant’s intent to cause serious physical injury (see, People v Vigliotti, 270 AD2d 904 [4th Dept 2000] [victim shot in chest from two feet or less during argument with defendant; proof sufficient to establish intent to cause serious physical injury]; People v Ramirez, 182 AD2d 569 [1st Dept 1992] [same]; People v Dukes, 30 AD3d 682 [3rd Dept… [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 6:50 am
People v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
Raich v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 2:48 pm
Morrison, 529 U.S. 598 (2000). [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 3:29 pm
In the state case (People v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:32 am
See Mota v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 10:09 am
People v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 3:10 pm
(See Garcia v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 12:17 pm
Faulks, 201 F.3d 208, 209 (3d Cir. 2000); United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 4:35 am
Cardinas Garcia, 596 F.3d 788 (10th Cir. 2010). [read post]
