Search for: "People v. Gilbert" Results 121 - 140 of 310
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2017, 9:55 am
Judge Kozinski, who made streaming arguments available when he was chief judge, said, "It is rewarding to find out people actually use them. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 11:26 am
The article notes quotes the Chief as saying "people are still surprised to see a woman as chief; if they're not in the law, they're startled. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  One thing people are realizing is that TM is messy. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 9:26 am
Yesterday's DJ features PJ Gilbert's column titled Miss Ann Thrope, in which he presents his New Year's resolutions: 1. try not to criticize people who overused the "infuriatingly annoying adjective 'iconic'"; 2. try not to complain about misuse of the word "planet" as in 'so and so is the best X on the planet'; 3. not to foist foolish limericks on unsuspecting victims (yes, an example is in the column). ... 5. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 1:55 pm by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
The 10,265 people killed in alcohol-impaired crashes in 2015 was an increase of nearly 300 from 2014, and 2016 was shaping up to be even deadlier. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 7:18 am by Jeff Welty
App. 2002) (finding it “self-evident” that spitting on a person is an assault and joining “other jurisdictions holding that an intentional and unconsented spitting on another constitutes a criminal battery”) Gilbert v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 7:18 am by Jeff Welty
App. 2002) (finding it “self-evident” that spitting on a person is an assault and joining “other jurisdictions holding that an intentional and unconsented spitting on another constitutes a criminal battery”) Gilbert v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 10:02 pm by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
Requirements of a Valid Entrapment Claim In this case, the Arizona Supreme Court outlined the requirements needed to make a valid claim of entrapment: Citing State v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 11:09 am by Bill
") It would seem obvious that whether a record is kept on paper, or electronically is irrelevant to whether it is relevant or likely to lead to relevant information, but people still fight about it--  see, e.g., Gilbert v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 6:13 am by Barry Sookman
The decision by Justice Tremblay-Lamer in Bell Canada v ITVBOX.NET 2016 FC 612 to grant the injunction was not surprising. [read post]