Search for: "People v. Giles"
Results 41 - 60
of 212
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2018, 1:51 pm
” I accept also that society places a high emphasis on protecting vulnerable people, particularly vulnerable children. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 12:22 pm
The post The Bedworth bedroom conundrum by Giles Peaker appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 2:57 pm
The post Ex parte’d, airbnb’d, departed by Giles Peaker appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:19 pm
He has been completely selfless in his time and efforts for HLPA – above and beyond – and for many other people. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 4:18 pm
It is also emphasized that the comparator must be with ordinary people, not ordinary homeless people. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 1:25 pm
, Turner v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 1:30 pm
Thomas v Lambeth LBC, County Court at Central London, 16 March 2017 This is a s.204 appeal in the County Court of a vulnerability decision by Lambeth. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 1:01 am
From his opinion in Marbury v. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 12:22 pm
It is, as the High Court quite properly found, about people seeking to [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 4:02 pm
The post Subletting and defamation – a novel approach by Giles Peaker appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 1:50 pm
[…] New build homes for social rent will prioritise the lettings of the new homes to people currently living in the ward in which they are being built. [read post]
17 May 2017, 6:27 am
See attached Declaration of Giles Miller. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 2:04 pm
We think there’s about 40 people there. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 2:15 pm
There was X v Hounslow,and Glasgow City Council v Mitchell. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 3:16 pm
The post Community contribution, priority stars and discrimination by Giles Peaker app [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 5:03 am
The private investigator who has been helping me (Giles Miller of Lynx Insights & Investigations) couldn’t find the ostensible Lynd v. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 3:05 pm
Osman, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Harrow (2017) EWHC 274 (Admin) A challenge to Harrow’s allocation policy, specifically on the ‘downgrading’ of allocation priority for overcrowded households in PRS accommodation, while existing Harrow tenants kept the higher priority for overcrowding on a transfer application. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 2:52 pm
Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223). [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 9:35 am
As is how people are to get to access the remaining courts, because the MoJ based travel time estimates on having a car… But no matter, because even if there was a local court open, it is unlikely that people could get representation anyway. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 4:51 am
People have also been puzzled about what it means for ASB cases. [read post]
